Contact us
|
Home
|
Login
| Users Online: 334
Feedback
Subscribe
Advertise
Search
Advanced Search
Month wise articles
Figures next to the month indicate the number of articles in that month
2022
January
[
3
]
2021
November
[
2
]
September
[
3
]
August
[
1
]
June
[
2
]
January
[
1
]
2020
November
[
3
]
August
[
1
]
July
[
1
]
May
[
1
]
February
[
1
]
2019
December
[
2
]
September
[
1
]
August
[
2
]
July
[
2
]
June
[
1
]
May
[
1
]
April
[
1
]
March
[
1
]
February
[
2
]
2018
December
[
4
]
November
[
1
]
August
[
1
]
July
[
1
]
May
[
1
]
2017
October
[
1
]
September
[
3
]
June
[
1
]
May
[
1
]
March
[
1
]
February
[
1
]
2016
April
[
1
]
March
[
1
]
January
[
2
]
2015
October
[
3
]
September
[
3
]
June
[
4
]
March
[
2
]
January
[
1
]
2014
October
[
2
]
September
[
2
]
August
[
2
]
July
[
1
]
June
[
1
]
May
[
1
]
March
[
1
]
January
[
2
]
2013
December
[
2
]
November
[
1
]
July
[
1
]
June
[
1
]
March
[
2
]
2012
December
[
1
]
September
[
3
]
August
[
1
]
July
[
1
]
April
[
3
]
March
[
1
]
February
[
1
]
2011
August
[
2
]
July
[
2
]
June
[
1
]
May
[
1
]
March
[
2
]
January
[
1
]
2010
October
[
3
]
» Articles published in the past year
To view other articles click corresponding year from the navigation links on the left side.
All
|
Abstracts
|
Commentary
|
Editorial
|
Erratum
|
Original Article
|
Original Articles
|
Original Research
|
Research Article
|
Review Article
|
Technical Note
Export selected to
Endnote
Reference Manager
Procite
Medlars Format
RefWorks Format
BibTex Format
Show all abstracts
Show selected abstracts
Export selected to
Add to my list
Research Article:
Statistical analysis of survival models using feature quantification on prostate cancer histopathological images
Jian Ren, Eric A Singer, Evita Sadimin, David J Foran, Xin Qi
J Pathol Inform
2019, 10:30 (27 September 2019)
DOI
:10.4103/jpi.jpi_85_18
PMID
:31620309
Background:
Grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma is based on the Gleason scoring system and the more recently established prognostic grade groups. Typically, prostate cancer grading is performed by pathologists based on the morphology of the tumor on hematoxylin and eosin (H and E) slides. In this study, we investigated the histopathological image features with various survival models and attempted to study their correlations.
Methods:
Three texture methods (speeded-up robust features, histogram of oriented gradient, and local binary pattern) and two convolutional neural network (CNN)-based methods were applied to quantify histopathological image features. Five survival models were assessed on those image features in the context with other prostate clinical prognostic factors, including primary and secondary Gleason patterns, prostate-specific antigen levels, age, and clinical tumor stages.
Results:
Based on statistical comparisons among different image features with survival models, image features from CNN-based method with a recurrent neural network called CNN-long-short-term memory provided the highest hazard ratio of prostate cancer recurrence under Cox regression with an elastic net penalty.
Conclusions:
This approach outperformed the other image quantification methods listed above. Using this approach, patient outcomes were highly correlated with the histopathological image features of the tissue samples. In future studies, we plan to investigate the potential use of this approach for predicting recurrence in a wider range of cancer types.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Citations (2) ]
[PubMed]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Sitemap
|
What's New
Feedback
|
Copyright and Disclaimer
|
Privacy Notice
© Journal of Pathology Informatics | Published by Wolters Kluwer -
Medknow
Online since 10
th
March, 2010