Contact us
|
Home
|
Login
| Users Online: 3883
Feedback
Subscribe
Advertise
Search
Advanced Search
Month wise articles
Figures next to the month indicate the number of articles in that month
2022
March
[
1
]
January
[
10
]
2021
December
[
7
]
November
[
9
]
September
[
8
]
August
[
2
]
July
[
1
]
June
[
4
]
May
[
3
]
April
[
4
]
March
[
7
]
February
[
3
]
January
[
6
]
2020
December
[
2
]
November
[
5
]
October
[
3
]
September
[
2
]
August
[
8
]
July
[
4
]
June
[
2
]
May
[
1
]
April
[
3
]
March
[
3
]
February
[
6
]
January
[
1
]
2019
December
[
6
]
November
[
4
]
September
[
4
]
August
[
3
]
July
[
6
]
June
[
1
]
May
[
2
]
April
[
6
]
March
[
3
]
February
[
4
]
January
[
2
]
2018
December
[
10
]
November
[
4
]
October
[
3
]
September
[
4
]
August
[
1
]
July
[
3
]
June
[
5
]
May
[
4
]
April
[
10
]
March
[
2
]
February
[
4
]
2017
December
[
5
]
November
[
4
]
October
[
3
]
September
[
9
]
July
[
5
]
June
[
2
]
May
[
4
]
April
[
6
]
March
[
6
]
February
[
7
]
2016
December
[
7
]
November
[
5
]
October
[
3
]
September
[
7
]
August
[
1
]
July
[
7
]
May
[
8
]
April
[
7
]
March
[
4
]
February
[
2
]
January
[
5
]
2015
November
[
4
]
October
[
5
]
September
[
5
]
August
[
4
]
July
[
3
]
June
[
19
]
May
[
5
]
April
[
1
]
March
[
5
]
February
[
9
]
January
[
3
]
2014
November
[
2
]
October
[
5
]
September
[
4
]
August
[
6
]
July
[
8
]
June
[
1
]
May
[
3
]
March
[
8
]
February
[
3
]
January
[
4
]
2013
December
[
5
]
November
[
2
]
October
[
4
]
September
[
4
]
August
[
3
]
July
[
3
]
June
[
5
]
May
[
7
]
March
[
18
]
February
[
1
]
January
[
1
]
2012
December
[
6
]
November
[
1
]
October
[
4
]
September
[
4
]
August
[
7
]
July
[
2
]
June
[
1
]
May
[
2
]
April
[
7
]
March
[
6
]
February
[
7
]
January
[
13
]
2011
December
[
3
]
November
[
1
]
October
[
7
]
August
[
9
]
July
[
3
]
June
[
7
]
May
[
3
]
March
[
6
]
February
[
8
]
January
[
6
]
2010
December
[
4
]
November
[
1
]
October
[
6
]
September
[
1
]
August
[
6
]
July
[
6
]
May
[
5
]
» Articles published in the past year
To view other articles click corresponding year from the navigation links on the left side.
All
|
Abstracts
|
Book Review
|
Commentaries
|
Commentary
|
Editorial
|
Letters to Editor
|
Original Article
|
Original Articles
|
Original Research
|
Original Research Article
|
Research Article
|
Research Articles
|
Review Articles
|
Symposium
|
Technical Note
|
Technical Note: Software
Export selected to
Endnote
Reference Manager
Procite
Medlars Format
RefWorks Format
BibTex Format
Show all abstracts
Show selected abstracts
Export selected to
Add to my list
Research Article:
Consultation on urological specimens from referred cancer patients using real-time digital microscopy: Optimizing the workflow
Henrik Holten-Rossing, Lise Grupe Larsen, Birgitte Grønkær Toft, Anand Loya, Ben Vainer
J Pathol Inform
2016, 7:11 (1 March 2016)
DOI
:10.4103/2153-3539.177689
PMID
:27076989
Introduction:
Centralization of cancer treatment entails a reassessment of the diagnostic tissue specimens. Packaging and shipment of glass slides from the local to the central pathology unit means that the standard procedure is time-consuming and that it is difficult to comply with governmental requirements. The aim was to evaluate whether real-time digital microscopy for urological cancer specimens during the primary diagnostic process can replace subsequent physical slide referral and reassessment without compromising diagnostic safety.
Methods:
From May to October 2014, tissue specimens from 130 patients with urological cancer received at Næstved Hospital's Pathology Department, and expected to be referred for further treatment at cancer unit of a university hospital, were diagnosed using standard light microscopy. In the event of diagnostic uncertainty, the VisionTek digital microscope (Sakura Finetek) was employed. The Pathology Department at Næstved Hospital was equipped with a digital microscope and three consultant pathologists were stationed at Rigshospitalet with workstations optimized for digital microscopy. Representative slides for each case were selected for consultation and live digital consultation took place over the telephone using remote access software. Time of start and finish for each case was logged. For the physically referred cases, time from arrival to sign-out was logged in the national pathology information system, and time spent on microscopy and reporting was noted manually. Diagnosis, number of involved biopsies, grade, and stage were compared between digital microscopy and conventional microscopy.
Results:
Complete data were available for all 130 cases. Standard procedure with referral of urological cancer specimens took a mean of 8 min 56 s for microscopy, reporting and sign-out per case. For live digital consultations, a mean of 18 min 37 s was spent on each consultation with 4 min 43 s for each case, depending on the number of digital slides included. Only in two cases could a consensus regarding the diagnosis not be reached during live consultation; this did not, it should be noted, affect patient treatment. Complete agreement between conventional and digital histopathology diagnosis was reached in all the 53 patients referred to central pathology units. The participating pathologists were in general comfortable using live digital microscopy, but they emphasized that a fast internet connection was essential for a smooth consultation.
Discussion
and
Conclusion:
An almost perfect agreement between live digital and conventional microscopy was observed in this study. Live digital consultation allowed cases to be referred from local hospitals to central cancer units without the standard delay caused by shipment. Only a few preselected specimen slides for each patient were presented in live consultation, which reduced the time spent on diagnosis compared to using the conventional method. Implementation of real-time digital microscopy would result in quicker turnaround and patient referral time, and with careful selection of relevant specimen slides for consultation, diagnostic safety would not be compromised.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Citations (3) ]
[PubMed]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Original Article:
Comparison of the diagnostic utility of digital pathology systems for telemicrobiology
Daniel D Rhoads, Nadia F Habib-Bein, Rahman S Hariri, Douglas J Hartman, Sara E Monaco, Andrew Lesniak, Jon Duboy, Mohamed El-Sayed Salama, Liron Pantanowitz
J Pathol Inform
2016, 7:10 (1 March 2016)
DOI
:10.4103/2153-3539.177687
PMID
:27076988
Introduction:
Telemicrobiology is a growing component of clinical microbiology informatics. However, few studies have been performed to assess the diagnostic utility of telemicroscopy systems in evaluating infectious agents.
Objective:
Evaluate multiple contemporary digital pathology platforms for use in diagnostic telemicrobiology.
Materials and Methods:
A mix of thirty cases that included viral, bacterial, fungal, and parasitological findings were evaluated by four experts using ×40 whole slide imaging (WSI) scans, ×83 oil-immersion WSI scans, ×100 oil-immersion WSI scans, digital photomicrographs, and glass slides.
Results:
The ×83 WSI, ×100 WSI, and photomicrograph interpretations were not significantly different in quality and accuracy when compared to glass slide interpretations. The ×40 WSI interpretations were of lower quality and were more likely to be incorrect when compared to glass slide interpretations.
Conclusions:
In this study, high magnification, oil-immersion digital pathology platforms are better suited to support telemicrobiology applications and yield interpretations on par with glass slide evaluations.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Citations (5) ]
[PubMed]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Commentary:
Commentary: Can pathologists interpret digital images as well as they interpret microscope slides?
Thomas W Bauer
J Pathol Inform
2016, 7:9 (1 March 2016)
DOI
:10.4103/2153-3539.177683
PMID
:27076987
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[PubMed]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Original Article:
Utilization of virtual microscopy in cytotechnology educational programs in the United States
Maheswari S Mukherjee, Amber D Donnelly, Vincent J DeAgano, Elizabeth R Lyden, Stanley J Radio
J Pathol Inform
2016, 7:8 (1 March 2016)
DOI
:10.4103/2153-3539.177682
PMID
:27076986
Background:
Our cytotechnology (CT) program has been utilizing virtual microscopy (VM) as an adjunct educational resource since 2011.
Aims:
The aim of this study was to identify the utilization of VM in other CT programs across the United States (US).
Subjects
and Methods:
A cover letter was sent to the program directors of all accredited CT programs in the US (excluding our program), requesting their participation in an online survey. After 2 days, the participants were sent an online link to the survey. The survey results were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
Results:
There were a total of 25 respondents to the survey. Among the 25, three CT programs use VM. Two of the three programs have been using VM for <2 years while another program for "2-4" years. The respondents found that VM's side-by-side comparison feature helped to demonstrate differences between diagnoses and preparation methods, and VM helped to preserve the important slides by digitizing them. Respondents believed that teaching with glass slides was very important. The reasons for not using VM were that VM is expensive and time-consuming to incorporate into the program, and lack of manpower resources to create digitized teaching files.
Conclusions:
The CT programs that use VM found it to be a valuable educational tool. Even though many were not using VM, responses from the survey indicated they will likely use it in the future.
[ABSTRACT]
[HTML Full text]
[PDF]
[Mobile Full text]
[EPub]
[Citations (7) ]
[PubMed]
[Sword Plugin for Repository]
Beta
Sitemap
|
What's New
Feedback
|
Copyright and Disclaimer
|
Privacy Notice
© Journal of Pathology Informatics | Published by Wolters Kluwer -
Medknow
Online since 10
th
March, 2010